Not financial advice. Options involve risk and are not suitable for all investors. Data is delayed up to 15 minutes.
Sell near-term call and put options while buying longer-dated options at matching strikes.
A double calendar combines two calendar spreads on the same underlying: a put calendar at a strike below the stock and a call calendar at a strike above it. In each calendar you sell the near-term option and buy the longer-dated option at the same strike. The position is opened for a net debit, and that debit is the maximum loss.
The strategy profits when the stock finishes near either short strike at the front-month expiration, where the short option expires worthless and the long option retains the most time value. Because both calendars are long vega, a rise in implied volatility helps the position, which is why double calendars are often placed ahead of earnings or other events with the front expiration before the event and the back expiration after it.
At the front-month expiration the payoff curve has two humps, one over each short strike, with a shallow dip between them and losses growing beyond the strikes as the long options lose time value. Compared with a single calendar the double version has a wider profit range, at the cost of a lower peak profit relative to the debit.
Highest near either short strike before front expiration
Net debit paid
Depends on IV and time value
XYZ trades at $100. For the put side you sell the $95 put expiring in 30 days for $1.20 and buy the $95 put expiring in 90 days for $2.80, a $1.60 debit. For the call side you sell the $105 call expiring in 30 days for $1.30 and buy the $105 call expiring in 90 days for $2.90, a $1.60 debit. The total net debit is $3.20 per share, or $320 per double calendar. At the front-month expiration both long options will have 60 days remaining.
| Stock at expiration | Result |
|---|---|
| $100 (unchanged) | Both short options expire worthless. The long $95 put and long $105 call are each $5.00 out of the money with 60 days left and are assumed to be worth $1.70 apiece, or $3.40 total. Position value is $340 against a $320 cost, a gain of $20. |
| $105 | Both short options expire worthless. The long $105 call is at the money and assumed worth $3.60, while the long $95 put is $10.00 out of the money and assumed worth $0.60. Position value is $420, a gain of $100, the approximate maximum. The result at $95 mirrors this. |
| $95 | Both short options expire worthless. The long $95 put is at the money and assumed worth $3.60, while the long $105 call is assumed worth $0.60. Position value is $420, a gain of $100. |
| $110 | The short $105 call is $5.00 in the money and costs $500 to close. The long $105 call is assumed worth $6.70 ($5.00 intrinsic plus $1.70 time value) and the long $95 put is assumed worth $0.20. Net value is $690 minus $500, or $190, a loss of $130. Loss approaches the full $320 debit on a larger move. |
Maximum profit is roughly $100 if XYZ finishes at either the $95 or the $105 strike at the front-month expiration, with the exact figure depending on implied volatility at that time. Maximum loss is the $320 net debit. Approximate breakevens are near $94 and $106, so the profit range is about $12 wide, noticeably wider than a single calendar at the same debit.